Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
69.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.8 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight420g / 14.82oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €435.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a ball bearings of 4+1, while Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX
