Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.0:1). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
