Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX edges out Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the durability (7 out of 10). Still, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch and a gear ratio of 5.5:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin INKS 4000X
