Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and ball bearings (4+1). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Delphin YUPIE
