Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX and Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX offers a ball bearings of 4+1, while Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X
