Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
