Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
