Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Beastmaster
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650
Conclusion
Shimano Beastmaster edges out Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4+1 and a weight of 265g / 9,35oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Beastmaster?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX
