Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.0:1). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X
