Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X and Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X offers a ball bearings of 4+1, while Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
