Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Beastmaster
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650
Conclusion
Shimano Beastmaster edges out Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4+1 and a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Beastmaster?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
