Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X offers a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a total score of 7.38 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX
