Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X offers a ball bearings of 4+1, while Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 3500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X
