Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX and Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 105 centimeter / 41.34 inch, while Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX stands out for a weight of 150g / 5291oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa 21 Presso LT?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
- A high retrieve rate of 10 out of 10 (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX
