Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX and Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 105 centimeter / 41.34 inch, while Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX stands out for a weight of 150g / 5291oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa 21 Presso LT?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
- A high retrieve rate of 10 out of 10 (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
