Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 545g / 19,22oz and a ergonomics of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
