Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ 500 and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X
