Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €537.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.4 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). While Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ 500 and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
