Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X edges out Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (4) and the durability (7 out of 10). Still, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 82cm / 32.28 inch and a maximum drag of 4 kg, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ 500 and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X
