Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.6:1 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ 500 and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
