Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.6:1 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ 500 and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX
