Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) and the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.6:1 and a ball bearings of 4, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ 500 and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
