Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (170g / 6oz) and ergonomics (6.43 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ 500 and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX
