Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €537.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.4 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). While Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
