Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a gear ratio of 5.0:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
