Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (215g / 7,58oz) and ergonomics (6.28 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
