Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Delphin BRONZ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
