Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX and Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX offers a ball bearings of 3+1, while Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
