Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
