Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
