Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX offers a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a total score of 7.38 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
