Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
