Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
