Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (240g / 8,47oz). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
- Solid value at €52.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Delphin INKS 3000X
