Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
58.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Delphin INKS 6000X
