Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
58.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX
