Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
58.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
