Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
58.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX offers a ball bearings of 3+1, while Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
