Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.73 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD