Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa BG 8000X

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Daiwa BG
Spinning
68.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight850g / 29.98oz
Line retireve per crank135 centimeter / 53.15 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/500
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 8000X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and total score (6.83 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa BG 8000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa BG?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa BG 8000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
