Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.04 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 500 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
