Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.96 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
