Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

46.10 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.03 out of 10

Gear ratio4.7:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight290g / 10.23oz

Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €60.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000FJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG

Seafishing

201x

66.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics5.99 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight285g / 10.05oz

Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €477.10
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size201
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationLeft
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Conclusion

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues