Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

76.40 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.03 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight290g / 10.23oz

Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €60.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000XGFJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €635.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D-P
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX offers a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX

A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues