Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
