Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
