Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a total score of 7.96 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
