Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX and Daiwa TANACOM 1200X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX offers a gear ratio of 6.0:1, while Daiwa TANACOM 1200X stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa TANACOM?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X
