Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX and Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX offers a gear ratio of 6.0:1, while Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX stands out for a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX
