Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX edges out Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.0:1) and the weight (215g / 7,58oz). Still, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X
