Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX offers a gear ratio of 6.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX
