Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

63.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000FJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD

Feeder And Match

91.10 out of 100

Value for money5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight395g / 13.93oz

Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch

Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €199.00
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4012
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and total score (9.11 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX

With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.